Turn System Design Into
HIPAA-Ready Evidence
Designed for fast-moving systems and slow-moving audits. No more digging through docs the night before review day.
Designed for fast-moving systems and slow-moving audits. No more digging through docs the night before review day.
Risk analysis that’s already outdated
By the time an audit comes around, the documentation on file reflects how things used to work, instead of how ePHI actually moves through systems today.
Too many systems, not enough visibility
ePHI flows through APIs, third-party services, internal tools, and features added months apart, making it hard to confidently say where risk really exists when someone asks.
Auditor questions that trigger fire drills
Answering them often means pulling engineers into emergency walkthroughs, stitching together half-remembered decisions, and hoping the evidence holds up.
Compliance work that starts too late
Answering them often means pulling engineers into emergency walkthroughs, stitching together half-remembered decisions, and hoping the evidence holds up.
Manual reviews that don’t scale
Design reviews and threat assessments still depend on a few experienced people reading everything line by line.
Leadership asking for proof
When leadership asks whether HIPAA risk is under control, vague answers and outdated PDFs don’t inspire confidence.
HIPAA Security Rule mapped to real design decisions
SecurityReview.ai’s compliance mapping capability makes it easy to show how design choices support required safeguards without retrofitting compliance language later.
Answer audit questions with system-specific proof
When auditors ask how a specific application was reviewed, the answer is already documented and doesn’t rely on memory or emergency walkthroughs.
Risk analysis that updates as systems change
Risk analysis stays aligned with the current architecture no matter what. This avoids audits based on outdated assessments that no longer reflect how data actually flows.
Clear visibility into where ePHI flows
ePHI movement across services is documented in a way teams can actually explain, making conversations about access controls and exposure based on real system behavior.
Reduced manual review without losing oversight
Security teams spend less time discovering risk and more time validating it. Coverage increases without adding headcount or sacrificing accountability.
Clear and defensible updates for leadership
Leadership gets straightforward answers about what was reviewed, what risks were found, and how they were addressed. Confidence comes from evidence, and not reassurance.
Controls covered (HIPAA Security Rule)
Risk Analysis (45 CFR §164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A))
Risk Management (45 CFR §164.308(a)(1)(ii)(B))
Information system activity review (45 CFR §164.308(a)(1)(ii)(D))
Access control (45 CFR §164.312(a)(1))
Audit controls (45 CFR §164.312(b))
Integrity (45 CFR §164.312(c)(1))
Transmission security (45 CFR §164.312(e)(1))
